Jasper
Full Member
*Jasper*
Posts: 158
|
Post by Jasper on May 16, 2005 5:38:13 GMT -5
The favourite to win the Brownlow Medal :Chriss judd is in dought to be eligible to win the brownlow after elbowing a St Kilda player in the face, I hope he is found guilty because i hate him and i hate the eagles and then they will have nothing to brag about at the end of the season[glow=red,2,300](I mean there not gonna win the flag)[/glow]
|
|
|
|
Post by [D619S-Arrow] on May 16, 2005 5:51:50 GMT -5
He elbowed 2 guys in the face... and there was absolutley no reason for the second so i hope he gets done!!
|
|
|
|
Post by tajiritarantula on May 16, 2005 6:34:36 GMT -5
i hate the eagles and then they will have nothing to brag about at the end of the season And Brisbane are going to be having an illustrious season... |
|
Jasper
Full Member
*Jasper*
Posts: 158
|
Post by Jasper on May 16, 2005 7:37:43 GMT -5
Yeh well i mean its great that the eagles can play great football for the first 8 rounds but its the FINALS that actually matter, Theyll deffinently get there and probable in the top 4 but there youngsters will crack and they wont make it to the final.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lance on May 16, 2005 8:46:48 GMT -5
Judd is a disgrace. He should be stripped off his previous Brownlow medal for his shameful act. Think if little Auskick started running around elbowing people in the face.
Father: Jimmy, why did you elbow that boy in the face, breaking his nose, which slid the bone up into the brain to cause brain damage?
Jimmy: Umm... I saw Cwis Judd doo it
|
|
|
|
Post by PapaRoach on May 17, 2005 1:16:09 GMT -5
Bah! It doesn't matter. Judd had no chance anyway. Captain Ben Cousins is currently expected to be beating Judd by 3 points anyway. Spite the fact he was injured in round 2/3.
|
|
Jasper
Full Member
*Jasper*
Posts: 158
|
Post by Jasper on May 18, 2005 4:33:46 GMT -5
yeh i agree with lance. people look up to the bronlow medalist and if hes setiing this sort of example, alot of cases like lance pointed out are going to be happening
|
|
|
|
Post by tajiritarantula on May 18, 2005 6:42:21 GMT -5
yeh i agree with lance. people look up to the bronlow medalist and if hes setiing this sort of example, alot of cases like lance pointed out are going to be happening Oh bloody hell... get over it. He gets tagged week after week, and puts up with it, but finally it gets too much and he lashes out. If every player who got a one-week suspension was stripped of medals won, how many people do you think would still have something in their trophy cabinet? Not very many... Jonathan Brown was suspended for 6 weeks for punching someone repeatedly in the grand final, but no, he shouldn't be stripped of his premiership medals... |
|
|
|
Post by [D619S-Arrow] on May 19, 2005 8:53:00 GMT -5
If every player who got a one-week suspension was stripped of medals won, how many people do you think would still have something in their trophy cabinet? Well not Judd anyway  It only counts if it is during that season.. players should get refreshed after a new season as they do so you can't hold a suspension against someone for 3 or 4 years cause then  players like BARNABY FRENCH will be winning the Brownlow! |
|
|
|
Post by Lance on May 19, 2005 19:05:32 GMT -5
He gets tagged week after week, and puts up with it, but finally it gets too much and he lashes out. That's the thing. He lashed out. Exactly what the taggers strive for. They succeeded, Judd lost. "Dam, that person is tagging me.... I know! I'll shoot him in the face!" |
|
|
|
Post by tajiritarantula on May 20, 2005 7:20:20 GMT -5
That's the thing. He lashed out. Exactly what the taggers strive for. They succeeded, Judd lost. Yeah, I admit that... Juddy shouldn't have lashed out and I don't know why he did. He is suspended for a match, ineligible for this years Brownlow... don't you think he has been punished enough without introducing some about taking off his 2004 Brownlow? |
|
|
|
Post by [D619S-Arrow] on May 20, 2005 22:36:08 GMT -5
No he did it to 2 people.. he should have got 4 weeks!
and he should have his brownlow taken away to stop it from future happenenings..
People will thing ohh look what happened to Judd im not gonna do that.. and the game will run smooth
|
|
|
|
Post by tajiritarantula on May 21, 2005 5:04:07 GMT -5
People will thing ohh look what happened to Judd im not gonna do that.. and the game will run smooth If only it were that simple.... People brawl, punch, kinghit, flatten, sling and all sorts of other things in footy.... and now because an elbow has occurred, you wanna set a precedent and strip him of his Brownlow? It would be pretty crap to make a big example of something like that, and if it did happen, it would be pointless. |
|
|
|
Post by [D619S-Arrow] on May 21, 2005 7:07:58 GMT -5
The AFL is at a new turning point with its rules how everything is being varied and changed.. This would be a great rule and a great example to bring into the game now before someone is seriously hurt if not Killed.. If Judd's elbow had gone into that guys nose it could have killed him!
|
|
|
|
Post by tajiritarantula on May 21, 2005 8:32:17 GMT -5
If Judd's elbow had gone into that guys nose it could have killed him! Yes, but stop speculating on what could have happened 'if this had occurred', 'if he had have hit him there'. What has happened, has happened... and he didn't hit him in the nose. Had he got him in the arm, he possibly might not have even been reported, and we wouldn't be having this debate. Take everything on face-value alone, and don't say 'Strip him of his Brownlow because he COULD have hit him in the nose and killed him'. Yeah, he could have also missed him altogether and fallen over, flat on his face in the middle of Subiaco Oval... but he didn't... so take it as it happened. |
|
![[D619S-Arrow] Avatar](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v713/arrowbucket/obi2.gif)
