Jasper
Full Member
*Jasper*
Posts: 158
|
Post by Jasper on Apr 29, 2005 10:40:00 GMT -5
Whos Better out Of Matt Hardy And Jeff Hardy
|
|
|
Post by jasonwestwwe on Apr 29, 2005 18:00:16 GMT -5
well this is Hard! Jeff is a high Flying Dare devil and Matt can be that too and plus can do more stuff than Jeff so i say JEFF HARDY
|
|
|
Post by [D619S-Arrow] on Apr 29, 2005 19:04:24 GMT -5
Well they both have positives and negatives..
Jeff Hardy: Jeff Hardy's career was based on aerialatrics and agility and he was an impresser of the crowd in this way. He didn't have much strength but he made up for that with his speed.. Jeff had alot of endurance though and could take alot of the big moves and kickout... He also has good Stamina and in ring strategy.
Matt Hardy: Matt Hardy also had the speed and In-ring strategy that Jeff had... But he did have the aerial abilities that Jeff does.. Though Matt has alot more strength than Jeff. Matt is more technical with his moves and was a lot better brawler than Jeff and was more Intimidating than Jeff.
I feel that Matt and Jeff were the same because they were better than each other overall in different things.
Jeff Hardy
Strength: 6 Agility: 10 Speed: 10 Experience: 5 Strategy: 8 Brawling Ability: 7 Intimidation Factor: 7 Technical Skill: 8 Stamina: 10 Endurance: 10
Total: 81/100
Matt Hardy
Strength: 7 Agility: 9 Speed: 10 Experience: 7 Strategy: 8 Brawling Ability: 8 Intimidation Factor: 7 Technical Skill: 8 Stamina: 10 Endurance: 9
Total: 83/100
Final ratings: Jeff 8.1/10 Matt 8.3/10
Matt gets my vote by 0.2%
|
|
|
Post by Kurt Angle on Apr 29, 2005 20:42:40 GMT -5
Matt hardy. I always liked him better and he was a better wrestler.
Jeff Hardy: he kept on taking chances, whick led him to losing all the time.
So my vote is Matt hardy.
|
|
|
Post by tajiritarantula on Apr 29, 2005 20:57:23 GMT -5
Matt Hardy - They were both great wrestlers but I liked Matt's storylines better.
|
|
|
Post by Lance on Apr 30, 2005 1:44:35 GMT -5
Matt Hardy by far. Jeff had no wrestling skill or passion for the business. Their tag matches were always put together by Matt. Jeff also was unreliable, turning up late to the shows and refusing to storylines. He was one of the most sloppiest wrestlers ever, messing up almost every move, but it looked normal cause he flounders around in the ring like a rag doll. He was useless on the mic as well. The only thing he could do was fall of ladders, which is already being forgotten as others are achieving better.ie, If WWE would let him, London would be doing the Shooting Stars Press off ladders, I am sure he has already done it. Jeff had alot of endurance though and could take alot of the big moves and kickout... He also has good Stamina Actually Jeff had some Energy Dissictionant Disorder or something, where he quickly runs out of energy.
|
|
|
Post by [D619S-Arrow] on Apr 30, 2005 3:19:02 GMT -5
Actually Jeff had some Energy Dissictionant Disorder or something, where he quickly runs out of energy. Yes, but this wasn't evident during his matches.. and SO if u didn't read about it on the net you wouldn't have known
|
|
|
Post by HBK on Apr 30, 2005 6:36:15 GMT -5
If WWE would let him, London would be doing the Shooting Stars Press off ladders, I am sure he has already done it. I doubt London would, but maybe Kidman As for this question I cant answer. I think that Matt was good on the mike, could wrestle in singles matches better than Jeff and was more technically sound. However I think that Jeff had more high-flying moves and was not afraid to hurt himself. I also liked Jeffs stint as a hardcore division wrestler. So I cant decide. I think Ill just say - The Hardy Boyz
|
|
|
Post by Lance on Apr 30, 2005 7:49:17 GMT -5
Yes, but this wasn't evident during his matches.. and SO if u didn't read about it on the net you wouldn't have known I actually read it in a wrestling magazine, Total Wrestling or something. And HBK, Kidman would never do a Shooting Stars Press off a ladder, he would probably screw it up or something. London would do it in a blink.
|
|
RuCk_FuLEs!
Full Member
User was...
100%
RuCK_FuLEs !
Posts: 204
|
Post by RuCk_FuLEs! on Apr 30, 2005 21:47:54 GMT -5
Jeff Hardy by far hes never been on himself like Matt has and Jeff is a lot more risk taking then matt and risks is wat u have to do to win matches.
So my vote goes to Jeff
|
|
|
Post by papydum on May 4, 2005 2:28:30 GMT -5
Jeff Hardy by far hes never been on himself like Matt has and Jeff is a lot more risk taking then matt and risks is wat u have to do to win matches. So my vote goes to Jeff yer i agree we need risk takin people and jeff was by himself when matt was on smackdown and jeff was on raw
|
|
|
Post by gamefreak2811 on May 6, 2005 15:10:24 GMT -5
If this was a thread of who is a better entertainer, my vote would go to Jeff. But if it was a thread of who is the better wrestler, I would vote for Matt. Overall, I think they both rock
|
|