World Champion Vote

[jasonwestwwe]

Who do u think would be a better Champ?
Please be honest and keep on voting! ;D

[[D619S-Arrow]]

AINT NO STOPPING ME NO!......

Where's the JBL vote?

[snerkie]

lol, JBL aint good enough

Batista, yup, he'd do great as a champ and could bring on some great feuds and matches and...yeah. Yup, so go Batista!!

[[D619S-Arrow]]

JBL AINT GOOD ENOUGH!!!

WHY IS HE THE CURRENT WWE CHAMO THEN AND NOT MATT HARDY OR BATISTA

JBL IS OUR FIGHTING CHAMPION AND BATISTA IS A WANNABE LETS SEE HIM GET THROUGH JBL, UNLESS HE IS TOO SCARED TO FACE HIM AT MANIA!

[snerkie]

lol, because Matt Hardy just recovered from his knee injury (or still is recovering) Batista rules!! He can squash most wrestlers, JBL just gets everyone else to squash others for him!!

[wwefreak]

JBL aint a good wrestler, why cant u see that, hes not a good techniqual wrestler, he hardly ever takes risks, hes not even that strong really, hes just and oldie, whos time came too late. Taker on the other hand is old but good because hes a techniqual genius, has a high durability. Plus his time came when he was young. And randy is just the king because he is quick, can be strong, a great technitian and has a good instinct. JBL is nothing without his cabinet.

[[D619S-Arrow]]

LOL HAHAHAHAHA

Taker is old but he is technical good... what a load of Taker is a brawler who has no technique at all!! He is the worst technician in all WWE, He has no technical moves either, and taker is way older than JBL.. Plus Taker has had his Prime, his career peek.. JBL is having his now! lol HAHAHA

HIGH DURABILITY.. WTF U are talking crap m8.. just cause he is ur favourite u dont actually look at the truth u just say what u wanna hear.. Taker is shocking.. he doesn't even get moves delivered to him properly cause he is so scared he may get injured!!

[snerkie]

Taker used to be good but he's getting older and he only ever gets to win win win and does the same moves over and over again. Yeah he's still a pretty good wrestler but he aint great. (he doesn't get injured much does he...)

[[D619S-Arrow]]

Yeah cause he is too cautious and lets no one do moves to him

[wwefreak]

what the?, so your admitting that he never gets beat up, so ur admitting that hes a good wrestler?

[[D619S-Arrow]]

Im admitting he doesn't get beaten up because he is afraid of being injured causew of his age.. and no im not admitting he is a good wrestler as a wrestler he is he is brawler and an entertainer there is no 'Wrestler' repeat [glow=red,2,300]Wrestler[/glow] about him!!!

[snerkie]

Yup, he can do a fair bit for his age, he is getting fair old (yes i know Ric Flair is ancient and won't give up!!) but Taker seems to just win most of his matches...or if he loses his opponent takes heaps of really hard blows to make the match look good.

[wwefreak]

taker has only not won due to outside interference in ages. try about almost 2 1/2 years. and he hasnt been pinned or submitted in nearly a year and a half, cmo, how good is that

[Lance]

wwefreak said:

taker has only not won due to outside interference in ages. try about almost 2 1/2 years. and he hasnt been pinned or submitted in nearly a year and a half, cmo, how good is that

Taker is crap. If he wasnt, he would be champion.
Event: Armageddon
Result: JBL defeated the Undertaker, Booker T and Eddie Guerrero to retain the WWE title
Event: No Mercy
Result: JBL defeated the Undertaker to retain the WWE title in a Last Ride match
Event: SummerSlam
Result: JBL defeated the Undertaker to retain the WWE title by DQ
Three losses to JBL in a row!

He has never won the Rumble... He got eliminated by MAVEN!

And the only reason he hasnt lost in ages is because he is getting old and can't even wrestle every weak. Face it, Taker sucks so bad he can't even have a weekly Smackdown match, let alone win one.

[[D619S-Arrow]]

The only reason u say he is good is cause he is ur fav, if he wasnt u would see it from our point of view!